ENGLISH (832) 930-3059 | SPANISH (832) 356-7254
Daniel Albert Law FirmDaniel Albert Law Firm

Michigan Child Support and Other Expenses – The National Law Review

Child support in Michigan is based on a formula that takes into account the parents’ incomes, the number overnights with the children, child care expenses for children 12 and under, and health insurance premium expenses for the children. Reaching a child support figure is often a contentious issue between parents when there is no agreement on the number of overnights or when a parent’s income is not straightforward. Whether they eventually reach a support number by agreement or are ordered one by the court, in most cases the amount ordered is not enough for the payee, and it seems burdensome to the payor of support. Payors are usually surprised to learn that child support does not cover all of their children’s expenses. Child support generally covers food, clothing and shelter expenses only.
Parents will also have to pay for uninsured medical expenses. The division of the uninsured medical expenses (referred to as extraordinary medical expenses) is in proportion to the parties’ incomes as calculated in the child support formula. The payor pays a certain amount of these expenses in the monthly support number, however once the payee meets a defined threshold each year, the remaining uninsured expenses (co-pays, office visits, prescriptions, etc.) are shared pro rata between the parents.
Child support also does not cover expenses such as extracurricular activity fees/gear, field trips, cell phones, computers, car insurance, SAT/ACT preparatory classes and college visits. Unlike child care and uninsured medical expenses, the court does not mandate parents to pay for such expenses, and parents are forced to negotiate agreements. It can be challenging if parents have disparate means to pay or have differing thoughts on which activities children should be involved, which gadgets they should have, or if the child should get a job.
It is difficult to address every potential expense proactively in a judgment of divorce or settlement agreement. The common approach is to include a provision that says “the parties will share any extracurricular expenses which are agreed upon in advance with mom paying ___% and dad paying ___% (usually pro rata).” Such a provision gives parents some support in seeking reimbursement for expenses that have been in place for some time. For example, when children have taken piano lessons or played a particular sport for years and both parents have been on board, but now one parent is refusing to contribute. However, the language leaves parents with the option to disagree to new expenditures or negotiate a different percentage. Parents can agree to list specific expenses that they are obligated to share at a particular percentage. Any agreements included in a court order or settlement agreement will be enforced by courts.
Mediation and parenting coordinators can be useful resources for parents who are having trouble reaching agreements post-judgment since the courts do not have the authority to do anything other than to enforce specific agreements. Often the children themselves will put pressure on one or both parents to get what they want or to continue an activity. In more difficult cases, the more relenting parent is left paying the entire expense, or the child is simply denied.
As parents of older children know, their children’s expenses – food, clothing, shelter and all of the extras – usually do not end when they turn 18 or graduate from high school. Though many parents will address extracurricular expenses for their minor children in their divorce agreements, most do not formalize agreements about post-majority expenses. The parent who has employer-provided health insurance for the children is likely to continue covering the children until they are 26 if it is still available at a reasonable cost. However, because child support is no longer being paid, the cost of the premium is no longer apportioned between the parents, and this must be negotiated at the time of the divorce or by agreement down the road.
What if children attend college? There are fewer complications if they have funded 529 plans. But who is paying for transportation to and from school, clothing, cell phones, spending money? Where do the children live when they come home from school? If the children were young at the time of the divorce, the parents had no reason to think about such issues. Parents of older children may be thinking about them, but unless the other parent is willing to make agreements there is no way to mandate solutions. We hope that down the road, once emotions have settled, that parents will figure out how to address these expenses. Unfortunately, many will not, and those children are either caught in the middle or left to figure out solutions on their own.
About this Author
Shalini is a member of the Family Law Practice Team. She specializes in family law litigation, including high-income and high-asset divorces, custody and parenting time, child support, paternity, property division, retirement benefits and post-judgment matters. Her goal is to help clients during one of the most difficult times of their lives get from Point A to Point B in the most efficient and painless manner possible.
Shalini is a trained mediator and an adjunct faculty member teaching family law at the University of Detroit – Mercy School of Law, as well as a regular presenter…
As a woman owned company, The National Law Review is a certified member of the Women's Business Enterprise National Council
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review’s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC’s  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  
Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 
Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.
The National Law Review – National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.


Leave A Reply

Subscribe to our newsletter and promotions